Games Movies Music Tech Food Books
Screenshot of Eater's food review: Eater's Best Restaurants list never mentions prices. Not once. Ever.

Eater's Best Restaurants list never mentions prices. Not once. Ever.

· Reviewing Eater
← All Reviews
3
out of 10 Our score for this review

The Original Review

Eater — Eater Staff
Rated: Best of 2024 · Published:
“We found ourselves settling into meals that felt exciting, confident, and joyful.”

Every year, Eater's editors fan out across America to discover the best new restaurants, and every year, the resulting list reads like it was assembled by people who all went to the same three colleges and vacation in the same four neighborhoods. The 2024 list features 14 restaurants. The methodology: 'more than a dozen reporters and editors' traveled the country eating at new spots that opened between September 2023 and September 2024. The criteria: vibes. The list tells you the food at these restaurants is 'exciting, confident, and joyful.' It does not tell you what any of this means.

Let me describe the Eater Best New Restaurants formula, because it hasn't changed in years. Step one: find a restaurant run by a photogenic chef with an interesting backstory. Step two: describe the food using words borrowed from a therapy session ('nourishing,' 'intentional,' 'joyful'). Step three: mention the chef's heritage as though it were a seasoning. Step four: never, under any circumstances, mention the price of anything. This last point is crucial. Eater's restaurant coverage exists in a parallel universe where money doesn't exist, where a $45 pasta dish and a $12 pasta dish are evaluated on identical terms, and where suggesting that cost matters to diners would be gauche.

The 2024 list includes restaurants in New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, and various other cities that Eater considers real. The geographic spread creates an illusion of diversity — look, we left the coasts! — while the aesthetic sensibility remains remarkably uniform. Every restaurant on this list serves food that photographs well for Instagram. Every description emphasizes the chef's 'vision.' Every entry reads like it was written by someone who would describe a sandwich as 'a meditation on grain and protein.' I am not making this up. Food media has collectively decided that restaurants are art galleries where you're allowed to chew.

Eater's fundamental conflict is that it exists as a Vox Media property that depends on restaurant advertising and industry relationships while simultaneously claiming to offer independent editorial judgment. The 'Best New Restaurants' list is Eater's biggest annual editorial product. It drives traffic, it generates social media engagement, and it makes or breaks restaurants' reputations. The restaurants that make the list get a surge of reservations. The restaurants that don't make the list get nothing. At no point does Eater explain why 14 is the right number, how the editors resolved disagreements, or whether any financial relationships exist between Vox Media and the restaurants or their ownership groups. The list arrives each November as received wisdom from on high, and we're all supposed to be grateful for the revelation.

#elitist#corporate-friendly#out-of-touch#bandwagon
Was this review of a review fair?
Bitter Cliff — Creator who fights back
@bitter_cliff Creator who fights back “Easy to say from the press box.”